Opinion
November 18, 1936.
Appeal from Schenectady County Court.
Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.
The indictment charged defendant with attempting to improperly influence a juror summoned for a Trial Term of the Supreme Court held in and for Schenectady county in violation of section 376 of the Penal Law. Testifying on his own behalf, defendant admitted having had two interviews with the juror, whom it is alleged he attempted to improperly influence, at the latter's home. On one of the occasions defendant testified that he said to this juror: "Are you working now?" The juror said: "Yes, on the P.W.A. job." The juror then said: "At the present time I am on the jury." Defendant then said to him: "You will have a chance now to see that justice is served; to see that the insurance companies won't get away with murder the way they have been, so far as verdicts are concerned." The evidence sustains the verdict of the jury finding defendant guilty. Alleged errors occurring on the trial do not affect the substantial rights of defendant and are disregarded under the provisions of section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed.