From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. German Sav. & Loan Soc.

Supreme Court of California
Feb 15, 1887
72 Cal. 28 (Cal. 1887)

Opinion

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL:

         Jarboe, Harrison & Goodfellow, for Appellant.

          Attorney-General Marshall, and W. T. Baggett, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         This is an appeal from a judgment directing a peremptory mandate to issue, commanding the defendant to permit the attorney-general to examine all its books and papers.

         Plaintiffs contend that a duty is specially enjoined on defendant to allow such examination by section 474 of the Political Code.

         That section does not authorize the attorney-general, or counsel appointed by him, to examine the books and papers of a corporation, except under the order and supervision of the court. (People v. Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, ante, p. 21.) The mandate should have been denied.

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the court below to dismiss the proceedings.


Summaries of

People v. German Sav. & Loan Soc.

Supreme Court of California
Feb 15, 1887
72 Cal. 28 (Cal. 1887)
Case details for

People v. German Sav. & Loan Soc.

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GERMAN SAVINGS AND LOAN SOCIETY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 15, 1887

Citations

72 Cal. 28 (Cal. 1887)
13 P. 51

Citing Cases

People v. Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc.

The attorney-general filed a "complaint," in which he alleged that the people had been informed and believed…