From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gerathy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 22, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-22-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Marilyn GERATHY, appellant.

Robert Schuster, Mt. Kisco, N.Y. (John R. Lewis of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.


Robert Schuster, Mt. Kisco, N.Y. (John R. Lewis of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Forman, J.), rendered December 9, 2014, convicting her of criminally negligent homicide and endangering the welfare of a vulnerable elderly person, or an incompetent or physically disabled person in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting her convictions is unpreserved for appellant review (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Hawkins, 11 N.Y.3d 484, 872 N.Y.S.2d 395, 900 N.E.2d 946 ). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932 ), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5] ; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 410, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053 ; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902 ).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., CHAMBERS, HINDS–RADIX and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gerathy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 22, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Gerathy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Marilyn GERATHY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
140 A.D.3d 1088
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4959