Opinion
SC: 147612 COA: 309951 Washtenaw CC: 09-002072-FH
02-07-2014
Order
Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh
Stephen J. Markman
Mary Beth Kelly
Brian K. Zahra
Bridget M. McCormack
David F. Viviano,
Justices
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the April 9, 2012 order of the Washtenaw Circuit Court. It appears that the circuit court did not recognize that it could exercise its discretion to modify the method of the defendant's restitution payment under MCL 780.766(12), even where the defendant's restitution stemmed from a plea agreement. The statute makes no distinction between restitution ordered as a part of a plea agreement or otherwise. We REMAND this case to the circuit court for a determination under the statute whether payment under the existing order will impose a manifest hardship on the defendant or his immediate family, and whether modifying the method of payment will impose a manifest hardship on the victims. Upon making these determinations, the circuit court may, in its discretion, determine whether to modify the method of payment.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
__________________________
Clerk