Opinion
June 20, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chetta, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The imposed sentence, which was agreed to by the defendant, was neither harsh nor excessive and did not constitute an abuse of the sentencing court's discretion (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.