From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gatiss

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 10, 2010
486 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 139628.

June 10, 2010.

Court of Appeals No. 289375.


Summary Disposition.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the December 13, 2007 order of the Alger Circuit Court, and we remand this case to that court to reconsider the defendant's motion for relief from judgment. A trial court, in its discretion, may generally strike pleadings containing "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, scandalous, or indecent matter." MCR 2.115(B). But the court may not dismiss a defendant's motion for relief from judgment merely for failure to comply with court rules; rather, the court must adjudicate the motion or return it "with a statement of reasons for its return." MCR 6.502(D). On remand, the court shall specify what portions of the defendant's pleadings were stricken as immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous. The court shall adjudicate the portions that merely failed to conform to the court rules or return the pleadings with an explanation for their return. In adjudicating the relevant portions of the motion, the court must "include a concise statement of the reasons for the denial," MCR 6.504(B)(2), or "set forth in the record its findings of fact and its conclusions of law, and enter an appropriate order disposing of the motion," MCR 6.508(E). Although the court's reasoning may again incorporate the prosecutor's response by reference, we note that the prosecutor did not respond to all of the defendant's arguments for relief; accordingly, the court must dispose of the defendant's remaining relevant arguments, if any, without merely referring to the prosecutor's response.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Gatiss

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 10, 2010
486 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Gatiss

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. GATISS

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jun 10, 2010

Citations

486 Mich. 960 (Mich. 2010)

Citing Cases

People v. Morris

The trial court abused its discretion by failing to address or decide defendant's Brady arguments. See People…

People v. Kittrell

See MCR 6.508(D)(3). The circuit court also failed to specifically (and adequately) address each of…