From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gaskin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2012
95 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-1

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael GASKIN, appellant.

Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.


Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), rendered January 21, 2011, convicting him of driving while intoxicated, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court's denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials ( see People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754; People v. Brathwaite, 263 A.D.2d 89, 91, 703 N.Y.S.2d 191; see also People v. Pena, 73 A.D.3d 1216, 900 N.Y.S.2d 913; People v. DeAngelo, 40 A.D.3d 656, 833 N.Y.S.2d 413; People v. Munford, 37 A.D.3d 855, 829 N.Y.S.2d 918).

SKELOS, J.P., FLORIO, ENG and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gaskin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2012
95 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Gaskin

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Michael GASKIN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3462
942 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

People v. Perry

As part of his plea agreement, the defendant waived his right to appeal. The defendant's unrestricted waiver…