From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gary

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 23, 2021
197 A.D.3d 1445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

112596

09-23-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andre GARY, Appellant.

Tina Sodhi, Alternate Public Defender, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for appellant. P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Jonathan P. Catania of counsel), for respondent.


Tina Sodhi, Alternate Public Defender, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Jonathan P. Catania of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Carter, J.), rendered January 14, 2020, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant waived indictment and pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated – as a class E felony – and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to, among other things, five years of probation. Defendant appeals.

As conceded by the People, the sentence imposed was illegal. Defendant had previously been convicted of driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(3) in 2019. Inasmuch as that conviction was within five years of the instant plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193(1–a)(a) requires the additional penalty of either five days in jail or 30 days of community service. As no such penalty was imposed by the court, the sentence imposed is less than is statutorily required and, therefore, is illegal.

"Where the plea bargain includes a sentence which is illegal because the minimum imposed is less than that required by law, ... the proper remedy is to vacate the sentence and afford the defendant, having been denied the benefit of the bargain, the opportunity to withdraw the plea" ( People v. Martin, 278 A.D.2d 743, 744, 718 N.Y.S.2d 445 [2000] [citation omitted]). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to County Court for resentencing in accordance with the governing sentencing statute, with the opportunity for defendant to withdraw from the plea agreement (see People v. Hulstrunk, 147 A.D.3d 1159, 1160, 46 N.Y.S.3d 443 [2017] ). In view of the foregoing, defendant's challenges to the validity of the appeal waiver and severity of the sentence imposed are academic (see People v. Vanhyning, 177 A.D.3d 1095, 1096, 115 N.Y.S.3d 129 [2019] ).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision; and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Gary

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 23, 2021
197 A.D.3d 1445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Gary

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Andre GARY, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

197 A.D.3d 1445 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
151 N.Y.S.3d 651

Citing Cases

People v. Stabb

Initially, defendant's challenge to the legality of his sentence survives the waiver of appeal (seePeople v.…