Opinion
February 8, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.).
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that evidence was illegally seized from a garage he occupied. The garage was rented from the landowner by Harry Jaffe pursuant to a written lease. Jaffe in turn agreed to let the defendant occupy the garage "as long as he paid" rent. The defendant failed to pay rent, and Jaffe's written lease was about to run out, so Jaffe broke the lock and entered the premises to prepare it for return to the landowner. After Jaffe complained to the defendant's uncle that items in the garage had to be removed before it could be returned to the landowner, the defendant's uncle notified the police, who searched the garage with Jaffe's consent.
The defendant had an expectation of privacy in the garage up until the moment of eviction ( see, People v. Ponto, 103 A.D.2d 573; People v. Stadtmore, 52 A.D.2d 853). However, the search of the garage by the police occurred after the prime tenant Jaffe evicted the defendant and assumed possession ( see, People v. Davis, 169 A.D.2d 16), pursuant to the defendant's agreement with Jaffe. Accordingly, at the time of the search, the defendant's interest or expectation of privacy in the garage had been terminated.
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or involve matters dehors the record that cannot be determined on direct appeal ( see, People v. Miller, 144 A.D.2d 867).
O'Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.