Opinion
2004-02864.
March 7, 2006.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered March 31, 2004, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (William Kastin of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel; Peter M. Doyle, Jr., on the brief), for respondent.
Before: Crane, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the prosecution failed to prove his identity as one of the complainant's attackers by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of assault in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15).