From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Garcia-Mandujano

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 7, 2016
SC: 153697 (Mich. Dec. 7, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153697

12-07-2016

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE L. GARCIA-MANDUJANO, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 324963
Van Buren CC: 14-019392-FC

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Van Buren County Prosecuting Attorney to file a supplemental response to the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall specifically address: (1) whether the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel where his trial attorney failed to impeach the testimony of the physician's assistant, that she used an adult speculum on the complainant, with the witness's report, which contained no reference to the speculum; and (2) whether the defendant was prejudiced by trial counsel's failure to use the physician assistant's report when cross-examining the witness.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 7, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

People v. Garcia-Mandujano

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 7, 2016
SC: 153697 (Mich. Dec. 7, 2016)
Case details for

People v. Garcia-Mandujano

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSE L…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 7, 2016

Citations

SC: 153697 (Mich. Dec. 7, 2016)