From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Garbutt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued June 22, 2001.

August 13, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Parker, J.), rendered June 21, 1999, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Aaron P. Micheau of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Shulamit Rosenblum of counsel; Maria V. Szulc on the brief), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's general waiver of his right to appeal was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. Furthermore, he was aware that his failure to comply with a condition of the plea agreement would subject him to an enhanced sentence, and of what that enhanced sentence would be. Accordingly, appellate review of his contention that the enhanced sentence was unduly harsh and excessive is precluded (see, People v. Miles, 268 A.D.2d 489).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see, People v. Miles, supra).

O'BRIEN, J.P., ALTMAN, FEUERSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Garbutt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Garbutt

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RUDIE GARBUTT, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 717

Citing Cases

People v. Miller

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's general waiver of his right to appeal was knowingly,…