From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gantt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1991
172 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 11, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Alvin Schlesinger, J.


At defendant's trial, the People offered evidence that two police officers observed defendant in possession of a shopping bag that contained over 3,600 glassine envelopes, 1,400 to which were chemically analyzed as containing an aggregate of over 4 1/8 ounces of heroin. In an effort to prove identification of defendant, who was being tried in absentia, as the individual arrested, the prosecutor asked one of the officers whether he saw defendant in the courtroom, and if there came a time that the officer saw defendant after the time of arrest. Both questions were objected to by defense counsel, and both objections were sustained.

The trial court had given specific instructions to the jury that where objections to questions are sustained, the jury was to disregard those questions. Additionally, defense counsel's request that the court refrain from giving a "no adverse inference" charge regarding defendant's absence from trial was granted. No objection was made to any portion of the Court's charge to the jury, and as it is presumed that the jury understood and followed the Court's instructions, this Court perceives no prejudice to defendant arising from the two stricken questions. (See, People v. Rodriguez, 103 A.D.2d 121.)

We have considered defendant's additional arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Gantt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 11, 1991
172 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Gantt

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD GANTT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 11, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
568 N.Y.S.2d 97