Corroboration of the victim's testimony was not required (see People v Fuller, 50 NY2d 628, 636 [1980]; People v Chilson, 133 AD2d 931, 932 [1987]). The victim's testimony "was not incredible as a matter of law inasmuch as it was not manifestly untrue, physically impossible, contrary to experience or self-contradictory' " (People v Gallegos, 30 Misc 3d 138[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 50214[U], *1 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011], quoting People v Lynch, 69 AD3d 959, 959 [2009]; see People v Shannon, 42 Misc 3d 127[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 52144[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2013]). In conducting an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, and observe their demeanor.