Opinion
October 2, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the propriety of his arrest and the seizure of physical evidence by the police is devoid of merit. A similar claim was raised by the codefendant on his appeal from the judgment of conviction and we adhere to the determination rendered therein (see, People v Colson, 150 A.D.2d 477).
Moreover, contrary to the defendant's contentions, the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally sufficient to support the trial court's verdict (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.