From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 1998
252 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Denis Boyle, J.).


The trial court did not constructively amend the indictment by instructing the jury that it could consider the property stolen to be either the bag containing the 17 vials of crack cocaine or the bracelet as alleged in the indictment, where such variance was based on defendant's own testimony that he committed a different version of the crime ( People v. Spann, 56 N.Y.2d 469). Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court was required to provide a claim-of-right charge (Penal Law § 155.15), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this contention, we would find that defendant's testimony failed to support such a charge.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 2, 1998
252 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Fuller

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS FULLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 353 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 533

Citing Cases

People v. William

When the deliberating jury asked whether sharing a crack pipe constituted a sale, the court did not…

People v. Salamone

The defendant's contention that he was entitled to a charge on “claim of right” with respect to the grand…