From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Frost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2005
16 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5757.

March 31, 2005.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert H. Straus, J., at hearing; Edward M. Davidowitz, J., at plea and sentence), rendered January 7, 2002, as amended January 29, 2002, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Ellerin and Catterson, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The detective's brief statement to defendant in response to defendant's inquiry as to how he had been identified did not constitute the functional equivalent of interrogation and thus did not require Miranda warnings ( see People v. Rivers, 56 NY2d 476, 480; People v. Lynes, 49 NY2d 286, 294-295). Defendant's admission, made immediately following the detective's response, was genuinely spontaneous.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea ( see People v. Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant's claims of innocence and coercion were contradicted by his plea allocution and without merit. Defendant's remaining challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would reject it.


Summaries of

People v. Frost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2005
16 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Frost

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC FROST, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

From the time of his arrest until the completion of his final statement, defendant insisted on discussing his…