From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

November 15, 1985

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly refused to permit defense counsel to use a police report to refresh the eyewitness's recollection since the witness exhibited no lack of memory (see, People v Boice, 89 A.D.2d 33). Because the evidence could not have been admitted under any circumstances, its exclusion was not error, even though the objection may have been made on an untenable ground (see, Fisch, New York Evidence § 20 [2d ed]).

We find defendant's other contentions to be without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Fross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1985
115 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Fross

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID FROSS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)