People v. French

3 Citing cases

  1. People v. French

    165 P.3d 836 (Colo. App. 2007)   Cited 9 times

    In an earlier decision, we affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence. People v. French, 141 P.3d 856 (Colo.App. 2005). However, on certiorari review, the supreme court vacated that judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of People v. Huber, 139 P.3d 628 (Colo.

  2. People v. Tucker

    232 P.3d 194 (Colo. App. 2009)   Cited 39 times
    In Tucker, the court held that where the defendant admitted to forging a district attorney's signature and where there was evidence that the defendant impersonated the district attorney to gain a benefit by deceitfully attempting to influence a judge in a criminal case, there was probable cause to believe defendant was attempting to commit or committing a crime or fraud.

    CRE 402; People v. Greenlee, 200 P.3d 363, 366 (Colo. 2009); People v. French, 141 P.3d 856, 860 (Colo.App. 2005), vacated and remanded, 165 P.3d 836 (Colo.App. 2007). Evidence is relevant when it has "any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence."

  3. People v. Blessett

    155 P.3d 388 (Colo. App. 2006)   Cited 13 times
    Declining to address the defendant's claim for enforcement of an alleged governmental promise during an interview because it was not raised in trial court and would often require factfinding, which an appellate court may not undertake

    Thus, Isaacks considered facts that were assertedly Blakely-complaint, whereas here, the aggravation involves a prior conviction, which is Blakely-exempt. See Lopez v. People, supra; People v. French, 141 P.3d 856 (Colo.App. 2005). We do not read Isaacks to apply to Blakely-exempt prior convictions.