From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. French

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 25, 2014
122 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

13599 1783N/09

11-25-2014

The PEOPLE of the State of New York Respondent, v. James FRENCH, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Frank Glaser of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Harold V. Ferguson, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Frank Glaser of counsel), for respondent.

GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, CLARK, JJ.

Opinion Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia M. Nunez, J. at summary denial of suppression motion; Robert M. Stolz, J. at jury trial and sentencing), rendered December 8, 2010, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to a term of eight years, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded for a hearing on defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony.

The court erred in summarily denying defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony as the product of an arrest without probable cause (see People v. Mendoza, 82 N.Y.2d 415, 604 N.Y.S.2d 922, 624 N.E.2d 1017 [1993] ; People v. Rivera, 42 A.D.3d 160, 836 N.Y.S.2d 148 [1st Dept.2007] ). While defendant's allegation that he was not engaged in criminal conduct at the time of his arrest was insufficient, standing alone, to frame a factual issue warranting a hearing, defendant also alleged that he did not engage in illegal or criminal activity “at that time nor any time prior,” that he did not “mak[e] any sale to any person that day,” that he was not “ involved in any drug sale” and that he did not “hav[e] a drug related conversation on that day with any person.” Accordingly, defendant sufficiently denied the drug sale that was the basis for his arrest. Under the circumstances, this was enough to require a hearing (see People v. Hightower, 85 N.Y.2d 988, 629 N.Y.S.2d 164, 652 N.E.2d 910 [1995] ; People v. Rivera, 42 A.D.3d at 163, 836 N.Y.S.2d 148 ).


Summaries of

People v. French

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 25, 2014
122 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. French

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York Respondent, v. James FRENCH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 535 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
997 N.Y.S.2d 394
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8240