Opinion
June 25, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed
The defendant's contention that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is not preserved for appellate review since he failed to object to its submission (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Wilkerson, 162 A.D.2d 568; People v Braithwaithe, 154 A.D.2d 543; People v. Bey-Cruz, 152 A.D.2d 756; People v. Jusino, 152 A.D.2d 744; cf., People v. Nimmons, 72 N.Y.2d 830) ; and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Wilkerson, supra; People v Mathis, 150 A.D.2d 613; People v. Lugo, 150 A.D.2d 502; cf., People v. Carballo, 158 A.D.2d 701).
The defendant's remaining contentions do not require reversal. Brown, J.P., Kooper, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.