From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Frederick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2017
156 A.D.3d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2014–11528 Ind. No. 940–13

12-27-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Shawdale FREDERICK, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Emily Constant, Acting District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Emily Constant, Acting District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Edward A. Bannan of counsel), for respondent.

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J., WILLIAM F. MASTRO, ROBERT J. MILLER, HECTOR D. LASALLE, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), imposed November 6, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, MILLER, LASALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Frederick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 27, 2017
156 A.D.3d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Frederick

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Shawdale FREDERICK, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 27, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 901 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
156 A.D.3d 901