From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Franco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 2008
55 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4196.

October 7, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2007, which denied defendant's motion to be resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York, (Barbara Zolot of counsel), and Milbank, Tweed, Hadley McCloy LLP, New York (Mehrnoosh Bigloo of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Elizabeth Squires of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Gonzalez, Sweeny, Catterson and DeGrasse, JJ.


The court properly recognized the degree of discretion it possessed ( compare People v Arana, 32 AD3d 305), and providently exercised it. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determination that resentencing was not warranted, particularly in view of the serious aggravating factors surrounding the underlying crime ( see e.g. People v Vasquez, 41 AD3d 111, lv dismissed 9 NY3d 870).


Summaries of

People v. Franco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 2008
55 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Franco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NEMENCIO FRANCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7557
864 N.Y.S.2d 310

Citing Cases

People v. Franco

November 7, 2008. Appeal from the 1st Dept: 55 AD3d 319 (NY). Jones,…

People v. Castillo

There is no basis for disturbing the court's determination that substantial justice dictated denial of…