From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Francisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 26, 2020
181 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

11307 Ind. 4948/16

03-26-2020

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin FRANCISCO, Defendant–Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Dalourny Nemorin of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Dalourny Nemorin of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.

Friedman, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Gesmer, Gonza´lez, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Francisco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 26, 2020
181 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Francisco

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin Francisco…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 26, 2020

Citations

181 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 2110
119 N.Y.S.3d 742