From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Francis

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Apr 15, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 132 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)

Opinion

2020-507 W CR

04-15-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Demore O. FRANCIS, Appellant.

John R. Lewis, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


John R. Lewis, for appellant.

Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, P.J., ELIZABETH H. EMERSON, TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

RUDERMAN, P.J., EMERSON and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Francis

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Apr 15, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 132 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
Case details for

People v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Demore O. Francis…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Apr 15, 2021

Citations

71 Misc. 3d 132 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50322
143 N.Y.S.3d 500