From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Francis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 28, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-28

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony FRANCIS, appellant.

John F. Ryan, White Plains, N.Y. (Salvatore A. Gaetani of counsel), for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Steven Bender of counsel), for respondent.



John F. Ryan, White Plains, N.Y. (Salvatore A. Gaetani of counsel), for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Steven Bender of counsel), for respondent.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, THOMAS A. DICKERSON, and L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), rendered March 24, 2011, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for resentencing before a different Judge in accordance herewith.

The defendant contends that the County Court improperly considered materially untrue assumptions and charges of which he was acquitted as a basis for sentencing. We reach that issue in the interest of justice.

The remarks of the County Court demonstrate that, in imposing sentence, it improperly speculated that the defendant attempted to kidnap the complainant and intended to burglarize his residence. Since the court sentenced the defendant, in part, “on the basis of materially untrue assumptions or misinformation,” the defendant was denied due process, and must be resentenced ( People v. Metellus, 46 A.D.3d 578, 579, 846 N.Y.S.2d 623;see People v. Naranjo, 89 N.Y.2d 1047, 659 N.Y.S.2d 826, 681 N.E.2d 1272;People v. Wilson, 303 A.D.2d 773, 757 N.Y.S.2d 446). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remit the matter to the County Court, Westchester County, for resentencing before a different Judge.

The defendant's contention that the County Court improperly considered charges of which he was acquitted as a basis for sentencing is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Francis

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 28, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony FRANCIS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
100 A.D.3d 1017
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8152

Citing Cases

People v. McKnight

We nevertheless address defendant's contention in appeal No. 2 because the waiver of the right to appeal…

People v. McKnight

We nevertheless address defendant's contention in appeal No. 2 because the waiver of the right to appeal…