From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Foster

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE
Jul 30, 2012
B240510 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

B240510

07-30-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEAUDRE FOSTER, Defendant and Appellant.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Mercer, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. NA090727)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Judith Levy Meyer, Judge. Dismissed.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Mercer, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant, Deaudre Foster, purports to appeal after he pled no contest to drug charges on January 24, 2012. Sentenced on the same date, his notice of appeal was not filed until April 12, 2012. We noted the appeal may be untimely. We have a duty to raise the issue of our own jurisdiction on our own motion and thus issued an order to show cause re: dismissal. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) We appointed counsel, allowed briefing and scheduled oral argument solely on the dismissal issue.

Defendant's notice of appeal was not timely filed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.308(a).) It was filed more than 60 days after he was sentenced. Thus, his appeal must be dismissed. (People v. Pritchett (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 190, 195.)

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P. J. We concur:

ARMSTRONG, J.

KRIEGLER, J.


Summaries of

People v. Foster

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE
Jul 30, 2012
B240510 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEAUDRE FOSTER, Defendant and…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

B240510 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2012)