Opinion
March 10, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demakos, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
The trial court did not err in refusing the jury's request that the summation of the defense counsel be reread, since the content of counsel's summation is not evidence (see, People v Jones, 106 A.D.2d 585; United States v. Guanti, 421 F.2d 792, 801, cert denied sub nom. Romano v. United States, 400 U.S. 832). The defendant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and are without merit. Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
My concurrence on the summation issue is on constraint of People v. Jones ( 106 A.D.2d 585).