From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Forte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1977
59 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

October 11, 1977


Appeal, as limited by the People's brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 29, 1977, as, after a hearing on defendant-respondent's motion to suppress statements made by him, granted the motion as to certain of the statements. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from. In our opinion, the circumstances under which defendant was interrogated required that the Miranda warnings be given (cf. People v Yukl, 25 N.Y.2d 585, cert den 400 U.S. 851). Although the warnings were given (and tape recorded) and defendant stated that he wanted an attorney, the police turned off the tape recorder and continued to converse with him until he — in the absence of an attorney — gave incriminating statements, which were then placed on the tape recorder. The "persuading" conversation was tantamount to an interrogation (see Brewer v Williams, 430 U.S. 387), and was in violation of defendant's Miranda right to have the interrogation cease once he had stated that he wanted an attorney (see People v Jackson, 41 N.Y.2d 146). Damiani, J.P., Shapiro, Mollen and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Forte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1977
59 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

People v. Forte

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ALFRED FORTE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1977

Citations

59 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Rivers

Defense counsel made no motion to strike the confession from the record or any other application to the…

People v. Byers

This the police failed to do. After a defendant has stated that he desires to speak with an attorney, even…