From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Forsman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1987
128 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

March 9, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leone, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no error in the trial court's entrapment charge (see, Penal Law § 25.00; § 40.05; People v. Laietta, 30 N.Y.2d 68, cert denied 407 U.S. 923). The bifurcated burden urged by the defendant (see, e.g., United States v. Braver, 450 F.2d 799, cert denied 405 U.S. 1064) is not followed in New York State (see, 1 CJI [NY] 40.05, at 921). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Forsman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1987
128 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Forsman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DOROTHY FORSMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1987

Citations

128 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Romero

05; People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467; People v Mincione, 131 A.D.2d 600, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 715; People v…

People v. Ricciardi

There is no basis for setting aside the court's conclusion (see, People v Mills, 142 A.D.2d 653, 654). We…