From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Forney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2001-04770

Argued March 10, 2003.

March 31, 2003.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), rendered May 22, 2001, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jay L. Weiner of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Seth M. Lieberman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

Where a defendant is found competent to stand trial, he is necessarily competent to waive his right to counsel and proceed pro se (see People v. Ferguson, 248 A.D.2d 725; see also People v. Reason, 37 N.Y.2d 351). The Supreme Court improperly denied the defendant's unequivocal and timely request to defend himself pro se, without conducting a proper inquiry (see Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806; People v. Arroyo, 98 N.Y.2d 101; People v. Slaughter, 78 N.Y.2d 485; People v. Smith, 68 N.Y.2d 737, cert denied 479 U.S. 953; People v. McIntyre, 36 N.Y.2d 10, 15; People v. Tejada, 289 A.D.2d 516; cf. People v. Venticinque, 301 A.D.2d 619 [2d Dept, Jan. 21, 2003]; People v. Bell, 234 A.D.2d 378). As the People correctly concede, the Supreme Court thereby denied the defendant his constitutional right to present his own defense, and the judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered.

At oral argument the attorney for the defendant, in effect, withdrew the defendant's claim that a new suppression hearing was warranted.

SANTUCCI, J.P., KRAUSMAN, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Forney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 2003
303 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Forney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ALFONZO FORNEY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

People v. Forney

There, Ms. Johnson requested on Forney's behalf that he be permitted to defend pro se (Apr. 13, 2004 Procs.…

People v. Paulin

This placed the defendant in an untenable position. Since the denial of the right of self-representation is…