From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

June 5, 1992

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Burke, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The jury's verdict is supported by the weight of the credible evidence (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The victim's identification of defendant and her account of defendant's conduct were substantiated by three eyewitnesses.

Defendant's contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, based upon facts that are outside the record, is not subject to review on direct appeal (see, People v. Robinson, 122 A.D.2d 173, 175, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 1003; People v. Banks, 117 A.D.2d 611, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 939). Insofar as we are able to review defendant's ineffective assistance claim, we find that defense counsel's performance amply met the standard of meaningful representation.


Summaries of

People v. Ford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 1992
184 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY FORD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1992

Citations

184 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
584 N.Y.S.2d 353

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his first attorney was ineffective does not survive the waiver…

People v. Williams [4th Dept 2000

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his first attorney was ineffective does not survive the waiver…