Summary
In People v. Fogg (supra, 14 Misc 3d 1206A) the Defendant, much like the Defendant in the case at bar, sought dismissal of the indictments on the grounds that the indictments were defective and did not substantially conform to the requirements of CPL Article 200 (CPL § 210.20[1][a], § 210.25), and also alleged that the evidence before the grand jury was not legally sufficient to establish the offenses charged.
Summary of this case from People v. RidleyOpinion
No. 3967.
October 26, 2006.
Crimes — Agency Defense in Narcotics Prosecution.