From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Flythe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

February 8, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal the defendant asserts that the People did not comply with the speedy trial requirements of CPL 30.30. This claim, however, was forfeited by defendant's guilty plea (People v O'Brien, 56 N.Y.2d 1009). The defendant's challenge to the court's Sandoval ruling was similarly forfeited by his guilty plea (People v Thompson, 117 A.D.2d 637).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Lawrence, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Flythe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1993
190 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Flythe

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH FLYTHE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1993

Citations

190 A.D.2d 748 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
593 N.Y.S.2d 541

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

Contrary to the defendant's contention, since there was no showing of suggestiveness, the People were not…