Issues of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo. People v. Flores, 2004 Guam 18 ¶ 8 (quoting Ada v. Guam Tel. Auth., 1999 Guam 10 ¶ 10)). "The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law reviewed de novo." People v. Perez, 1999 Guam 2 ¶ 6 (citations omitted).

"'[O]ur duty is to interpret statutes in light of their terms and legislative intent.'" People v. Flores, 2004 Guam 18 ¶ 8 (quoting Carlson v. Guam Tel. Auth., 2002 Guam 15 ¶ 46 n.7) (alteration in original).IV. ANALYSIS

An argument leading to an absurd result will not be adopted. See People v. Flores, 2004 Guam 18 P 18. Cyfred also complains that the Judgment "does not explain what will happen if the Abaloses do not restore the property, or if the money deposited in the court is insufficient to complete the job, and if the Abaloses squander the rest of the money."