From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Flores

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 11, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)

Opinion

571042/15

06-11-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin FLORES, Defendant-Appellant.


Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Herbert J. Adlerberg, J.), rendered October 9, 2015, affirmed.

On this record, we are unpersuaded that the bargained-for sentence imposed - payment of a $500 fine - was unduly harsh or severe, and find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Fair , 33 AD3d 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007] ). The defendant was sentenced in accordance with his bargained-for plea and should not now "be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (id. , quoting People v Chambers , 123 AD2d 270 [1986] ). Although defendant now claims that he is indigent, he never sought relief from the fine by way of a CPL 420.10(5) motion for re-sentencing (see People v Toledo , 101 AD3d 571 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 947 [2013] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

All concur


Summaries of

People v. Flores

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 11, 2021
71 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
Case details for

People v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin Flores…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Jun 11, 2021

Citations

71 Misc. 3d 140 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50544
146 N.Y.S.3d 719