Opinion
S281282
09-27-2023
PEOPLE v. FLETCHER
The petitions for review are granted.
The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Does Assembly Bill No. 333 amend the requirements for a true finding on a prior strike conviction ( Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b) - (i) & 1170.12, subds. (a) - (d) ) and a prior serious felony conviction ( Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (a) ), or is that determination made on "the date of that prior conviction"? (See Pen. Code, §§ 667, subd. (d)(1) & 1170.12, subd. (b)(1).) (2) Does Assembly Bill No. 333 (Stats. 2021, ch. 699), which modified the criminal street gang statute ( Pen. Code, § 186.22 ), unconstitutionally amend Proposition 21 and Proposition 36, if applied to strike convictions and serious felony convictions?
Pending review, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which is currently published at 92 Cal.App.5th 1374, 310 Cal.Rptr.3d 494, may be cited, not only for its persuasive value, but also for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conflict in authority that would in turn allow trial courts to exercise discretion under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 456, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937, to choose between sides of any such conflict. (See Standing Order Exercising Authority Under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.1115(e)(3), Upon Grant of Review or Transfer of a Matter with an Underlying Published Court of Appeal Opinion, Administrative Order 2021-04-21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3) and corresponding Comment, par. 2.)
Votes: Guerrero, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins and Evans, JJ.