Opinion
1479 KA 16–00446
12-22-2017
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Keith FLETCHER, Defendant–Appellant.
FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Memorandum:On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree ( Penal Law § 220.16[1] ), defendant contends that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We reject that contention. Defendant received the benefit of an advantageous plea agreement in which he pleaded guilty to one count in satisfaction of several pending cases and, despite being rearrested prior to sentencing in violation of County Court's warning, he nonetheless received a lesser sentence than the four-year term of incarceration in the original plea agreement.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.