From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fletcher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 21, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


The defendant's claim that the County Court failed to conduct a hearing before imposing restitution is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Appellate challenges to the procedures utilized in determining and imposing sentence are forfeited if they are not raised in a timely manner before the trial court (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281; People v. De Vito, 192 A.D.2d 671).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Miller, O'Brien, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Fletcher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 1994
209 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Fletcher

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CONROY FLETCHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 664

Citing Cases

People v. Martinez-Ramos

There is no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant acted recklessly…

People v. Martinez-Ramos

There is no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant acted recklessly…