Opinion
137 KA 16–01313
02-01-2019
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald J. FLAGG, Defendant–Appellant.
FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
FRANK J. NEBUSH, JR., PUBLIC DEFENDER, UTICA (DAVID A. COOKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
SCOTT D. MCNAMARA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, UTICA (STEVEN G. COX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree ( Penal Law § 265.03[3] ) and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree ( §§ 110.00, 265.03[3] ), defendant contends that he did not validly waive his right to appeal and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. The record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v. Bryant, 28 N.Y.3d 1094, 1096, 45 N.Y.S.3d 335, 68 N.E.3d 60 [2016] ; People v. Colon, 122 A.D.3d 1309, 1309, 995 N.Y.S.2d 429 [4th Dept. 2014], lv. denied 25 N.Y.3d 1200, 16 N.Y.S.3d 522, 37 N.E.3d 1165 [2015] ), and the valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ).