The court interviewed the person who wrote the article, who stood by her allegations, but the prospective juror averred that she did not make the statement and the two coworkers averred that they did not hear her make the statement. We see no reason to disturb the court's resolution of that credibility issue (see generally People v. Rodriguez, 291 A.D.2d 317, lv granted 98 N.Y.2d 701; People v. Flagg, 237 A.D.2d 955, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 893, 895). IV. Issues Related to Identification Testimony
Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Fallon, JJ. Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the same Memorandum as in People v Flagg ( 237 AD2d 955 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.)