From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 15, 1997
239 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 15, 1997

Appeal from the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.)


Defendant, a man in his 50s, was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degee for having sex with a 15-year-old female. At the time of defendant's plea, no specific promises were made with respect to the sentence to be imposed. We reject the contention that County Court abused its discretion in imposing a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Although this sentence was harsher than that which was recommended by the People or the probation officer, it is well settled that sentencing is a matter within the discretion of the court ( see, People v. Jarvis, 233 A.D.2d 632, 633, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 943). Contrary to defendant's assertions, we find no extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice.

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 15, 1997
239 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Fitzgerald

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD G. FITZGERALD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 15, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 711 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 487

Citing Cases

People v. Shute

discretion in sentencing him to a prison term of 1 1/3 to 4 years because the sentence was more harsh than…

People v. Mann

County Court not only informed defendant of the sentence that it would impose upon a plea of guilty, but a…