From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fisher

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 9, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

No. 63 KA 23-00288

02-09-2024

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREW S. FISHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ROSEMARIE RICHARDS, GILBERTSVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOHN C. TUNNEY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


ROSEMARIE RICHARDS, GILBERTSVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOHN C. TUNNEY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, AND KEANE, JJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Patrick F. McAllister, A.J.), rendered December 5, 2022. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.09 [2]). Defendant contends that County Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence without holding a hearing or otherwise making a sufficient inquiry regarding his alleged violation of the conditions of the plea agreement. That contention is not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant" 'failed to request such a hearing and did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground'" (People v Scott, 200 A.D.3d 1729, 1730 [4th Dept 2021]). In any event, the contention lacks merit. Under the circumstances, the court was not required to conduct a hearing, and it provided "[b]oth defendant and his counsel... ample opportunity to refute the court's assertions that defendant had violated the plea terms" (People v Albergotti, 17 N.Y.3d 748, 750 [2011]; see generally People v Semple, 23 A.D.3d 1058, 1059-1060 [4th Dept 2005], lv denied 6 N.Y.3d 852 [2006]), specifically by his failure to appear at sentencing and failure to report to probation as directed by the court (see People v Baker, 204 A.D.3d 1471, 1472 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 1069 [2022]; People v Winship, 26 A.D.3d 768, 768-769 [4th Dept 2006], lv denied 6 N.Y.3d 899 [2006]; see also Albergotti, 17 N.Y.3d at 749-750).


Summaries of

People v. Fisher

Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 9, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ANDREW S. FISHER…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 9, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)