From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Finstad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Balio, Doerr, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant's application to withdraw his Alford plea (see, North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25). The sole basis for withdrawal articulated by defense counsel prior to sentencing was defendant's disapproval of a comment in the presentence investigation report and a remark by the prosecutor that defendant is a "predator of children". That was insufficient to warrant the court's exercise of discretion in defendant's favor.

The record indicates that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see, People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273). Thus, we do not reach defendant's contentions that the suppression court erred in refusing to suppress certain physical evidence and that the probation conditions imposed by the sentencing court were unduly harsh. Were we to review the merits, we would nevertheless affirm.


Summaries of

People v. Finstad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Finstad

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EGIL FINSTAD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 568