From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fine

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1878
53 Cal. 263 (Cal. 1878)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court of Colusa County.

         The defendant was convicted of an assault to commit murder, and appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         Hines & Brooks, for Appellant.

         Attorney-General Hamilton, for the People.


         OPINION          THE COURT

         The intention with which the assault was committed was a material issue of fact to be determined by the jury; and if the assault was committed, not with the intent to commit murder, as charged in the indictment, but to do great bodily harm or some lesser offense included in the greater one charged in the indictment, the jury might have convicted the accused of the lesser offense. But the Court instructed the jury that if they found a verdict of guilty they must convict him of the offense charged in the indictment. This was error.

         Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

People v. Fine

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1878
53 Cal. 263 (Cal. 1878)
Case details for

People v. Fine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE v. WM. A. FINE

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1878

Citations

53 Cal. 263 (Cal. 1878)

Citing Cases

People v. Galloway

Under the charge here, the intention with which the assault was committed was a material fact, to be…

People v. Avila

If the assault is not committed with murderous intent, it is an assault of lesser degree. (See People v.…