From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Filiey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 31, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant did not move to withdraw his plea under CPL 220.60 (3) or to vacate the judgment of conviction under CPL 440.10, his contention that the plea allocution was insufficient has not been preserved for our review (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665). Nor does defendant's plea allocution qualify for the "rare case" exception to the preservation doctrine (People v. Lopez, supra, at 666; see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 N.Y.2d 839).

We conclude that defendant's sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.

Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Filiey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Filiey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER A. FILIEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 1208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 365