Opinion
April 11, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's assertion that his plea of guilty was factually deficient is without merit. Because the defendant pleaded guilty to a lesser offense than that with which he was charged, it was not incumbent upon the court to see that a factual basis for the particular crime confessed to was adduced (see, People v Adams, 57 N.Y.2d 1035, 1038; People v Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950, 951; People v Harris, 186 A.D.2d 677).
The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was constitutionally defective because he did not expressly acknowledge that by pleading guilty he was waiving his right to present evidence in his own behalf at trial is without merit under the facts of this case (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.