From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

September 1, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Howard Bell, J., Ronald A. Zweibel, J.


Miranda warnings (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436) were not required prior to the officer's inquiry regarding the ownership of the vehicle, since the question posed was not an interrogation aimed at eliciting an incriminating statement, but rather was for "housekeeping" purposes to determine the appropriate disposition of the vehicle (see, People v. Johnson, 86 A.D.2d 165, affd 59 N.Y.2d 1014).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Wallach, Rubin and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Fernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 1, 1994
207 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LIAL FERNANDEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 943

Citing Cases

People v. Weston

The court properly denied suppression of defendant's statements made to the police during a traffic stop…

People v. Norbert

was, indeed, a reflective response by the marshall to the defendant's serious injuries, it resulted in an…