From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Fermin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 2000
272 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 25, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriero, J.), rendered July 7, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Sylvia Wertheimer, for respondent.

Robert P. Preuss, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Rubin, Andrias, Buckley, JJ.


Defendant's claim that the People failed to establish the foundation required by CPL 60.25 (1) (a) (iii) for admission of the victim's out-of-court identification is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the existing record as a whole permits the inference that the victim was unable to make an in-court identification due to lack of present recollection.

On the existing record, we find that trial counsel provided meaningful representation and that his alleged deficiencies did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 713-714; People v. Hobot, 84 N.Y.2d 1021, 1024).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Fermin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 25, 2000
272 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Fermin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JOSE FERMIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 25, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
709 N.Y.S.2d 397

Citing Cases

Quinones v. Miller

Nevertheless, we cannot conclude that the Appellate Division's rejection of this argument was objectively…

People v. Harden

The court properly admitted the victim's out-of-court identification of defendant, pursuant to CPL…