Opinion
January 30, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions concerning the admission of bolstering testimony (see, People v Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471), and the trial court's charge with reference thereto, have not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05), and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
We have considered the remaining contentions raised in the defendant's pro se supplemental brief and addendum, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.